student ghost towns
Apr. 10th, 2008 12:30 pm'The government may tighten planning laws to end concentrations of student houses in England's university towns.'
"Housing Minister Caroline Flint said: "It is not acceptable that in too many areas, people living in houses in multiple occupation and local communities alike are having their quality of life affected."
What I find strange, and sadly consistent, is that people rarely put into words why these student areas are actually a bad thing. There seems to be consensus among the authorities and local groups that having high concentrations of student housing is a bad thing, but they won't come out and say why.
"Her department has commissioned outside consultants to investigate and come up with proposals within a couple of months. It will investigate how the planning system can create "more effective management" of such shared homes and disperse concentrations."
Are students the new blacks/Jews/gypsies? Is it ok to say that you don't want them living near you, just because they are students, and students are still fair game whereas ethnic groups and religious groups no longer are? Are they a problem that needs 'dispersing'? Why not 'disperse' the Muslim ghettos, or the chavs on council estates, or perhaps the entire population of Birmingham? I'm curious to see the justification for this.
"'Universities are already looking at ways to improve the situation,' a spokesman said. 'Many have invested heavily in new student halls[...]'" New halls aren't the answer. They are very expensive by comparison to normal housing, often taking up something like 75% of your student loan, and fail to prepare students for 'life on the outside', ie. doing their own chores, paying bills, etc., which is probably easier to start adjusting to in their 2nd year at university than when they graduate.
So, what is the real issue here?
"Housing Minister Caroline Flint said: "It is not acceptable that in too many areas, people living in houses in multiple occupation and local communities alike are having their quality of life affected."
What I find strange, and sadly consistent, is that people rarely put into words why these student areas are actually a bad thing. There seems to be consensus among the authorities and local groups that having high concentrations of student housing is a bad thing, but they won't come out and say why.
"Her department has commissioned outside consultants to investigate and come up with proposals within a couple of months. It will investigate how the planning system can create "more effective management" of such shared homes and disperse concentrations."
Are students the new blacks/Jews/gypsies? Is it ok to say that you don't want them living near you, just because they are students, and students are still fair game whereas ethnic groups and religious groups no longer are? Are they a problem that needs 'dispersing'? Why not 'disperse' the Muslim ghettos, or the chavs on council estates, or perhaps the entire population of Birmingham? I'm curious to see the justification for this.
"'Universities are already looking at ways to improve the situation,' a spokesman said. 'Many have invested heavily in new student halls[...]'" New halls aren't the answer. They are very expensive by comparison to normal housing, often taking up something like 75% of your student loan, and fail to prepare students for 'life on the outside', ie. doing their own chores, paying bills, etc., which is probably easier to start adjusting to in their 2nd year at university than when they graduate.
So, what is the real issue here?